SUBSCRIBE HERE
2009/11/23
JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF INDIA
Posted by
ALL COMPETITIVE GURU
2009/11/23
Save And Share :
JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF INDIA
Save And Share :
JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF INDIA
The laws and judicial system of British India were continued after
independence with only slight modifications. The supreme court
consists of a chief justice and up to 25 judges, appointed by the
president, who hold office until age 65. The court’s duties include
interpreting the constitution, handling all disputes between the
central government and a state or between states themselves, and
judging appeals from lower courts.
As of January 2003, there were 18 high courts, subordinate to
but not under the control of the supreme court. Each state’s
judicial system is headed by a high court (three high courts have
jurisdiction over more than one state), whose judges are
appointed by the president and over whom state legislatures have
no control. High court judges can serve up to the age of 62. Each
state is divided into districts; within each district, a hierarchy of
civil courts is responsible to the principal civil courts, presided
over by a district judge. The 1973 Code of Criminal Procedure,
effective 1 April 1974, provides for the appointment of separate
sets of magistrates for the performance of executive and judicial
functions within the criminal court system. Executive magistrates
are responsible to the state government; judicial magistrates are
under the control of the high court in each state.
Different personal laws are administered through the single
civil court system. Islamic law (Shari’ah) governs many
noncriminal matters involving Muslims, including family law,
inheritance and divorce. There are strong constitutional
safeguards assuring the independence of the judiciary. In 1993–
94, the supreme court rendered important judgments imposing
limits on the use of the constitutional device known as
“President’s Rule” by the central government and reaffirming
India’s secular commitment.
In Kashmir the judicial system barely functions due to threats
by militants against judges and witnesses.
India accepts the compulsory jurisdiction of the International
Court of Justice with reservations.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment